Galxe and Zealy Quests: A Campaign Plan That Holds Up

1 outcome before the first task

1 outcome gives a Galxe or Zealy quest a clear job. Pick a result your team can recognize from participant actions. Examples include product onboarding, feature discovery or useful community contributions.

1 outcome | 3 task stages | 1 review owner

Start by writing one sentence that names the audience and desired action. Then decide what evidence would show that action happened. Several unrelated goals make a quest harder to explain and review.

Make these 4 choices before drafting tasks:

• Audience: who should be able to take part?
• Action: what should a participant learn, try or contribute?
• Evidence: what can your reviewer actually inspect?
• Follow-up: what can a participant do after finishing?

A quest is not a promise of a future token allocation. State only rewards and conditions your project has confirmed. Use a broader token launch checklist if the quest sits inside a wider launch plan. Keep the quest objective specific enough to guide every later decision.

Which platform fits the task evidence?

2 platform checks can prevent a poor fit: test the participant path and inspect reviewer evidence. Galxe and Zealy both support quest-style participation. Your choice should follow the task and review flow you need.

Build 1 sample task in each platform before committing to a full sequence. Read it as a participant. Then review its evidence as the person approving completion. Note any step that needs an explanation outside the task page.

Check the current product interface and account options before publishing. Platform features and account rules can change. Confirm the setup available to you now. Keep the final task text and reward terms in your project files. Your support owner then has one consistent reference.

3 task stages make the path legible

3 stages connect understanding, product use and contribution. They help avoid turning the quest into a task catalogue. Give every task one purpose and one visible completion condition.

• Discover: introduce the product, use case or campaign rules.
• Try: invite an appropriate product action or feature exploration.
• Contribute: ask for feedback or a community action tied to the objective.

For every task, write 4 things: the destination, the required action, accepted evidence and any eligibility condition. Use plain instructions for people who have not followed your project before. If a task asks for a public post, explain its relevance. Don't require identical wording.

Remove tasks that add effort but give you no useful learning, product action or contribution. Then test every link and read the full path in participant order. Mark required and optional tasks clearly.

If community activity continues after the quest, give participants a relevant next step through your Telegram community growth guide.

How can you check participation without adding friction?

1 review plan should match the evidence to the action. A platform completion record may confirm a submitted step. It does not automatically show the quality of a written contribution or the learning behind an action.

Use these 5 checks before opening the quest:

1. Publish eligibility conditions before participants begin.
2. Ask for evidence that matches the specific task.
3. Set criteria for subjective work before anyone submits it.
4. Flag repeated or conflicting entries for human review.
5. Record accepted, rejected and unclear decisions consistently.

Assign 1 owner to review decisions and participant questions. Give that person the task text, evidence criteria and an escalation route. Ask only for information needed to assess completion. Explain how the team will use it.

A reasonable process makes decisions explainable without asking every participant for unnecessary information. Keep creator selection separate from task completion. If you are evaluating creators, the KOL campaign guide covers selection and campaign planning.

Reward rules belong beside the task

4 reward details belong in view before a participant starts. Show what is offered, who qualifies, how selection works and how delivery happens. Publish them beside the quest instructions, not as a later clarification.

• Eligibility: state which completed actions count.
• Selection: explain how you assess entries if rewards are limited.
• Timing: name the campaign close and participant update point.
• Claim: list delivery steps and any applicable deadline.
• Support: show where participants can ask about a decision.

Match the reward to the work required. A simple learning task should not demand several unrelated actions. For contribution-based rewards, state the review criteria. Name the decision owner. Before offering a digital asset, verify its details and test the delivery path.

Keep announcements consistent across the quest page and community channels. Do not change qualification rules without clearly communicating what applies to existing participants. A quest campaign service overview explains what support can cover when your team wants help operating the plan.

1 closeout report turns activity into decisions

1 closeout report should show what participants did, where review slowed and what your team should change next. Use consistent definitions for people who began, completed and passed review. Otherwise, the figures describe different groups.

Track these 5 items during the campaign and at closeout:

• Task completion: where participants finished or stopped.
• Review outcomes: accepted, rejected and unclear submissions.
• Friction: instructions or links that caused questions.
• Rewards: approved, delivered and pending actions.
• Next action: the follow-up that supports the campaign objective.

Check participant-facing instructions before launch. Then monitor evidence and common questions while the quest is live. If a correction is needed, explain it clearly. Preserve the published terms for people already taking part. Pair each finding with a specific change for the next campaign.

Galxe and Zealy control their account rules, task options and campaign display. Those can change. Your team controls its published criteria and reward process. Platform display, review decisions and distribution outcomes remain outside your control.

For cost planning, see the Galxe and Zealy quest campaign pricing guide. Send us your project link, objective, draft tasks and reward rules. We can check the plan before launch.

How it works

1. 1. Name the outcomeWrite the action or learning the quest should support. Define completion in terms your reviewer can explain.
2. 2. Map the task pathConnect each task to the outcome. Add its instruction, evidence and eligibility condition.
3. 3. Test the platform setupBuild 1 sample task in Galxe or Zealy. Check the participant view and the evidence available to your reviewer.
4. 4. Confirm review and rewardsAssign an owner for decisions and questions. Publish qualification, selection and delivery rules before launch.
5. 5. Review and close outTrack completion quality and friction during the campaign. Report review outcomes, reward status and the next action.