Circulating supply verification: 5 items your report should show

5 items your supply report puts on record

5 report items show how your circulating figure connects to project records. The file gives your team a clear basis for CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap follow-up.

At DigitalMedia1, we check that the figures, method and evidence agree. Each material statement links to a supporting source. Your team can review the evidence without relying on an unexplained spreadsheet total.

The report also makes later updates easier to track. It records the figure used and the records behind it. It shows which actions remain open.

For a broader tracker request, pair this work with CoinGecko listing preparation or CoinMarketCap listing preparation.

Which records support a CoinGecko supply figure?

A review file needs 3 things: a stated figure, a method and traceable records. Each balance category needs a clear reason for its treatment. Keep the explanation consistent with public project information.

Collect these inputs before we check the file:

• Token contract and relevant explorer references.
• Current reported figure and the figure you want reviewed.
• Calculation notes showing how you reached each figure.
• Vesting, allocation or release records where relevant.
• Treasury, locked-contract, burn or emission details where relevant.
• Public tokenomics information and a dated project statement.

The right evidence depends on your token design. A fixed-supply token may need a different explanation from one with emissions or several restricted wallets. Do not call a balance locked without identifying its restriction and source. Flag missing records for confirmation before finalizing the file.

For more on calculations and supporting records, use our circulating supply guide. We organize the material you provide. Your team confirms facts only the project can verify.

3 checks before we prepare the platform file

3 checks catch common gaps before platform materials are prepared. We compare your figure with its calculation, supporting records and current public statements.

• Figure check: confirm current and intended values. Record when the calculation was prepared.
• Category check: explain each material inclusion or exclusion in plain language.
• Source check: connect each key statement to a record or public reference.
• Profile check: confirm the token profile and target platform.
• Approval check: name the person authorized to confirm project information.

We prepare materials for the selected platform. Your team approves factual statements before submission. If the issue involves a contract migration or rebrand, align the token identity first. See migration and rebranding updates. For separate explorer corrections, review explorer token information and logo updates.

This check flags contradictions instead of choosing between versions. An older public tokenomics figure may conflict with a newer calculation. Your team should resolve that gap before submission.

5 steps from evidence check to final report

5 steps take the file from your first message through the final report. You approve project facts before platform materials are sent.

1. Send the source set: share the token contract, current and intended figures, calculation notes and relevant allocation records.
2. Reconcile the calculation: we compare the method with evidence for material balance categories. We flag unclear points.
3. Resolve open facts: your team confirms missing records or assumptions before we finalize submission text.
4. Approve the platform file: we organize materials for the selected platform. You approve factual statements. Work starts within 24 hours of confirmed payment.
5. Track and report: we log what was sent, platform questions and open actions. You get a final report with links and screenshots within 2 working days of the agreed work window ending.

One account lead keeps the follow-up record in one place. Your team can review the submitted version, platform questions and requested actions. If platform staff ask for clarification, we organize the next step around approved evidence.

What can CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap decide?

CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap decide how they classify supply. They also decide what information they accept for a profile. Their review queues and displayed figures remain outside the project’s control. We commit to the agreed evidence check, platform materials, follow-up log and final report—not a specific decision.

Your team controls the accuracy of its records, the clarity of its calculation and how quickly it confirms facts. Keep one approved figure and one source set for each request.

If the underlying basis changes after submission, explain the change with supporting records. Do not send a new figure without context.

For coordinated tracker work, start with the listings and verification hub. Send us the token contract, current and intended figures, calculation method, balance records and target platform. We will check the source set, identify gaps and send a written quote after review.

How it works

1. Send the source setShare the token contract, current and intended figures, calculation notes and relevant allocation records.
2. Reconcile the calculationDigitalMedia1 compares the stated method with evidence for material balance categories and flags unclear points.
3. Confirm open factsYour team confirms missing records or assumptions before any submission text is finalized.
4. Approve the platform fileWe organize platform-specific materials and send factual statements to you for approval.
5. Track and reportWe log submissions, platform questions and open actions, then send the final report with links and screenshots.